Faith

Forty, less one- Friday, 2nd week of Easter- Acts 5:34-42

Some years ago, during a retreat, the preacher said something that has since become an integral part of my priestly ministry. In consulting his spiritual director over the matter of accepting a post in the congregation, he was told the following by his spiritual director, “If you have in any way exercised influence to obtain this post, then know that you will fail even if you get the post; if not, it is God’s will and you will succeed.”

Most of us wrangle for jobs or services often with good intentions. But over a period of time nothing seems to go right, no matter how qualified we are or how well-meaning our belief may be. It has been my own experience that when God has ordained for you a task, no matter how ill equipped you may think you are to run it, you will succeed, for this is His idea.

It was God’s idea to send us a Saviour who though He endured suffering, was to rise again so that we would share in the same grace. All this was a bit too much for the Sanhedrin led by Caiaphas who had plotted the death of the “author of life” and now wished the same for His disciples.

No matter how often Peter and the apostles were told not to utter or preach in the name of Jesus, they were not to be silenced.  Peter lost no opportunity to bear witness to the name of Jesus, and the trial before the Sanhedrin simply provided him with another opportunity to proclaim his belief. Laying the death of Jesus squarely on the Jewish religious establishment, he so incensed the authorities that they “wanted to kill them.”

Spread the love ♥
23      
23
Shares
Continue Reading
Faith

God first-Thursday, 2nd Week in the Easter Season – Acts 5:27-33

Stubborn as a mule, that’s how the apostles could best be described. They had decided that they were not going into the night without a fight and no intimidation from any source; even as high as the highest Jewish religious body was going to shut them down. A good man’s name had been tarnished, he had falsely been executed for being a “leader and saviour” and now voices must be raised to bear witness to the truth.

All that I have just written sounds like a present day confrontation between justice seekers and corrupt institutions on the other hand. But that is what it was 2000 years ago in the Easter season. An attempt was being made to suppress the truth by no less that religious authority. Peter and the apostles were warned with dire consequences to “to not teach in this name” (Jesus’)

What threatened the Jewish authorities so much?  One can attribute a number of reasons. Take for example the fact that the Jewish authorities were responsible for the death of Jesus; they connived and plotted his death with the hope that one man’s death would save the nation. The nation they hoped to protect was Israel and they hoped to protect it from a very jittery Roman occupier who wanted to maintain the peace at all costs.

The fear of a mob swelling in support of Jesus, who challenged the very foundation and notions of a distorted faith ( distorted by the religious leaders ironically) was something the Jewish authorities could not risk for they knew the Romans would come down hard on them. So they built a case based on lies, false witnesses; they packed the benches and intimidated Pilate into pronouncing a death sentence.

His death they hoped had been done and dusted; unfortunately they did not factor in the Holy Spirit. Now the apostles are determined not to be silenced for they “must obey God and not any human authority”. By now the ranks of the apostles and believers have way out numbered the might of the Jewish leaders and the temple guards. The teachings of the apostles have ‘gone viral’ for ‘Jerusalem is filled with their teaching’  and fear has set once again in the hearts of the Jewish authorities for the nightmare they hoped they had ‘taken care of’ has come to haunt them even by day.

Spread the love ♥
12      
12
Shares
Continue Reading
Faith

Jail break- Wednesday, 2nd week of Easter- Acts 5:17-26

The narration of today tells us of the first jail break in the New Testament, and that too assisted by an angel. I guess heaven knows how to pick locks! But as much as this thought brings a smile to our face, what also should bring a smile is the witness of the apostles, for they had ‘faith without fear’.

There is nothing more terrifying than a justice system rooted in corruption. In this case the system was also motivated by ‘jealousy’ (5:17). The apostles have had great success with their evangelization, for we know that a record eight thousand people have joined their ranks and as 5:14 tells us, “a great number of both men and women were added to the Lord” (not to a Church or preacher as happens today).

The arrest of the apostles is not motivated by wrongdoing on their part but because of jealousy on the part of no less than the High Priest and a sect of the Sadducees.  At this time, Joseph Caiaphas, known simply as Caiaphas, was the actual high priest, having been appointed in A.D. 17. He was deposed A.D. 37.

Caiaphas had married the daughter of Annas. Even though out of office, Annas seems to have exercised a dominant influence, perhaps, as the Nasi, the Prince, or President, of the Sanhedrin, during the remainder of his life. If he presided on this occasion, it may explain why St. Luke calls Annas “the high priest.”

It is the same Caiaphas who is said to have organized the plot to kill Jesus. Caiaphas is also said to have been involved in the Sanhedrin trial of Jesus. He had a good working relationship with the Roman authorities, and that explains why he stayed on in power for so long. Now, ‘the’ Jesus whom he plotted against, has come back and the believers keep growing.

Spread the love ♥
8      
8
Shares
Continue Reading
Faith

Common-ism is not communism- Tuesday, 2nd week of Easter – Acts 4:32-37

I think the take away from this text must match the wonder and awe of the passage, as we read through it. The sense of community living in the early Church seems too good to be true; perhaps it was, as we will see in (5:1-6). But a point is being made here; when we share, we show we care.

Without a doubt, the early church lived a spirit of common-fellowship or as it was known in Greek, koinonia. This word appears twenty times in the Bible and refers to a twofold activity; of worshiping together and holding all their possessions in common (Acts 2:42-47).

While the common worship may not alarm many, for that is exactly what we do on a Sunday, the suggestion of holding all our possession in common may send many scampering out of our Church with the more capitalist minded calling such a move ‘communism’.

There is a difference between communism and ‘common-ism’.  Communism is when things are held commonly but under force or threat. Common-ism is when things are freely held together because they are given in love. The early church exhorted its members to live this ‘koinonia’, but we know from the story in Acts 5:1-6 that all in the early church did not subscribe entirely to this thought.

While the example of Barnabas, a native of Crete, is given as a positive example of one who sold his land and laid it at the feet of the apostles, there is also the story of a couple, Ananias and Sapphira, who, having sold their property kept some money back. We are told that both paid with their lives.

Spread the love ♥
7      
7
Shares
Continue Reading
Faith

The Annunciation, 1913. Oil on canvas, 98 x 124 cm. RF1977-138; Lux1031. Photo: Peter Willi.

An angel in the bedroom- The Annunciation of the Lord- Luke 1: 26-38

Somewhere in the loud voice of the Church, projecting over the centuries, the big “yes” of Mary, is an adolescent girl who was terrified on seeing an angel. Centuries of romanticising Mary’s ‘yes’ has perhaps taken away from her , the  overwhelmingly shocking fear of finding an angel hovering in her bedroom (the bedroom part is prose license). This was big news for Mary and it would take a lot more than a ‘I think you need to sit down and listen to this one’.   And yet from this simple Jewish maiden comes the ‘yes’ that gave us so great a redeemer.

Was it easy for Mary to say yes? Did she truly understand what was even going on? To rob Mary of her human emotions and feelings would do grave injustice to her and to us. We usually tend to get to the end of the story, but what about the beginning? This narrative tells us she was ‘afraid’. I guess that’s putting it mildly. She should have been ‘freaked out’, for that’s what happens when you get an angel in your bedroom, news of your pregnancy, an immaculate conception, promises of a great Son of the Most High who is to get a throne and bewilderment, as to what you are to tell your fiancé, parents, neighbours and God knows who else.

It must have been the longest five minutes of her life, especially when the angel is doing all the talking. Yet her two interjections say so much. It reflects her perplexity and it reflects her surrender. This is what gives me strength when I look at Mary; I find encouragement knowing that I too am afraid of the many things that God demands in my life. True I have not seen an angel in my bedroom, but I can’t deny the many callings to serve Him, the many times He challenges me, the many times He harkens me to obedience. Am I afraid? Yes! Should you be? Yes of course!

Spread the love ♥
34      
34
Shares
Continue Reading