Second last sin- Holy Week – Wednesday- Mathew 26:14-25
Matthews’s account of the betrayal of Jesus is preceded by the anointing of Jesus feet by ‘a woman’ at the house of Simon the leper. Interestingly in Mathew’s account, the woman is not Mary of Bethany, nor is the meeting at Lazarus’s house, but at Simon’s house. Noteworthy is that Matthew blames ‘all the disciples’ for being ‘angry’ at this ‘wasteful’ use of the expensive ointment.
In Matthew’s Gospel, Judas does not have an active role in the episode, unlike in John’s Gospel. But Matthew continues this incident, of the anointing of Jesus feet, with a Judas incident. Perhaps, a far more deadly one! Matthew thus contrasts the woman’s love with Judas hate.
The Gospels never explicitly tell us why Judas betrayed the Lord. We know that satan entered him and he gave into temptation. What we do see, is what happens after he gives in to satan’s invitation to sin. Judas surely played hardball with the chief priests in negotiating a deal. His question to them is pointed, “What will you give me if I betray Him to you?” The parameters of the deal were clear; it involved betrayal and a consideration.
Wow now that’s one anti-climax!
However Fr, I just wanted to know…wasn’t it God’s will that Jesus would be the Lamb that was slain? Also didn’t fully understand what the Bible means by it’s better that he (Judas) wasn’t born. Also it was written in scripture prophecy that He will be betrayed….and then again now that its turned out to be Judas, wasn’t that part of God’s plan for Jesus to be betrayed, disciples scattered, etc so His purpose for our Salvation would be fulfilled?
Garry, I responded to this on your whats ap and then saw this here too. I will respond on this group in a while. For now we must understand that the Gospels are not meant to be primarily a biography or a historical account. They are post resurrection narratives. Hence each Gospel must be seen in the light of its context. Having said that, Jesus was was not ‘pushed’ by God into God’s plan; Jesus willing accepted God’s plan so that we may be saved. So to hold that everything was predetermined would be some kind of fatalism which we would not subscribe to.
The problem is that you are reading texts from the Gospel of John sided by side with the Gospel of Matthew. Their theologies and contexts are quite different.
Have a Holy Tridum
Thanks for the lovely insights. The passion narratives always re-awaken an Outlook to our human behaviour. We can all “Be Human” if we give a greater thought to each minute event of the passion.
Nice Reflection Father.”He ransoms us from satan for the price of a slave; so much does He love us.”
Beautifully explained Fr. .. The bigger problem is not our sin but the refusal to accept the fact that we have sinned. Unless one acknowledges change is necessary, how can one even think of changing…. Thanku for the sharing Fr.