Hello!

ActsOfTheApostles
Acts of the Apostles
Advent
Advent2022
AdventReflections
ArchdiocesanHeritageMuseum
Archdiocesan Heritage Museum
Archdiocese of Bombay
ArchdioceseOfBombay
ArtAttack
BombaySeminary
catholic
cheriillustrates
Easter
Easter2023
Faith
Friday
Goanfood
GospelofLuke
Gospel of Mark
indianfood
Jesus
John's gospel
Johnthebaptist
Lent
Lent2021
Lent2023
Lent2024
Lockdowncooking
Matthew's Gospel
Monday
padrecancook
padreinthekitchen
Padrewarner
Pharisees
pottypadre
Prayer
sacredart
SacredArtInHundredWords
Saturday
Scripture
StPiusXCollege
Thursday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Father I was just listening to a podcast episode this morning about early Church Easter Vigils where the readings were longer and more in number. People would listen to these attentively with full interest. Why? Because most were illiterate and Bibles were expensive. So they would wait to hear God’s word with longing. Contrast this to today where we all find it hard to pay attention to the Liturgy of the Word because we’ve read these accounts so many times.
This resonated with the last point you made. I remember reading that there was a time where only the celebrant would receive Communion at the Sunday Mass while the rest would receive once a year. Of course I don’t think the older practice is better, because I believe Jesus refers to the Eucharist as “daily” (or St. Jerome’s, “super-substantial”) bread. But that older practice would have developed a sense of longing and anticipation to be able to receive Holy Communion, preceded by fasting and Confession (my grandparents had to confess weekly).