Kerala style chicken stew

Kerala style chicken stew
500 grams chicken
2 tosp coconut oil
1 teaspoon black pepper
3 to 4 green cardamom
Two cloves
Half inch cinnamon
1 tsp fennel seeds
7-8 garlic cloves
1 inch Ginger
3 to 4 green chilies
1 onion sliced
1 cup carrots, potatoes and peas
1 cup thin coconut milk
1/2 cup thick coconut milk
1 teaspoon garam masala
1 teaspoon black pepper powder
For the tadka or tempering
1 tbsp coconut oil
1/2 tsp mustard seeds
Hand ful of curry leaves a
Handful of Pearl shallots or small onion
in a Kadai or deep bottom dish add coconut oil and temper, the whole spices, add ginger garlic, green chilies, curry leaves followed by onion Add the chicken and sauté it well. once the chicken changes colour, add the thin coconut milk. Cover and cook for 15 minutes.
Once the chicken is cooked, add the thick coconut milk, garam masala powder and black pepper powder.
now for the tempering or tadka. In a small pan, add coconut oil, mustard seeds a handful of curry leaves, and handful pearl shallots or onions. Let the mustard seeds crackle and then pour it over the stew and mix well.
You can also fry some cashew nuts and add to the dish.
Empty gestures make only noise – Third Sunday in Lent – Exodus 20:1-17/ John 2:13-25
Empty gestures make only noise – Third Sunday in Lent – Exodus 20:1-17/ John 2:13-25
I would like to approach this teaching with a two-pronged approach; theologically (and I will not approach it as if I am writing a doctrinal thesis) and pastorally so that we can take a thought or two home.
The cleansing of the temple by Jesus is a narrative that is found in all four gospels. Not every narrative (the wedding at Canna being a case in point) is found in every Gospel. But what is unique to John’s Gospel is that it is placed right at the beginning of the Gospel in chapter two, just after the wedding at Canna. The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) have this narration towards the end of their Gospels
For the Synoptics (meaning to see together, because they are similar) the cleansing of the temple was the last straw that broke the camel’s back or in this case the tolerance levels of the Jewish establishment towards Jesus. It is this incident that drove the nail into Jesus’ coffin or more precisely, into his palms and feet. In the case of John’s Gospel, it was the raising of Lazarus.
So why does John position and present this text differently? For John, the cleansing of the temple is highlighted not so much in what he does (which is a bit different in details compared to the Synoptics) but rather in what Jesus says. “You will not make MY FATHER’s house into a marketplace.” (In the synoptics it is a den of thieves).
Here in lies the revelation of Jesus as the SON OF GOD establishing his authority at a time when every Jew from the region and the diaspora poured into the temple for the Passover. Jesus was not making some petty claim in a small town of Galilee. This was him making his bold case; he is the Messiah; he is the Son of God and this is his father’s house. This was his big-ticket announcement, his first public speech and one that would send ripples throughout the Jewish faith.
Coming to the pastoral implications. The Lord is presented as all riled up and while I would love to talk about our anger issues I would rather focus on the actions of Jesus. This is not the image of the sweetheart of Jesus that we have got used to; this is the Christ setting perspectives right. Understandably, commercial activity will surround religious expressions. But when the activity overtakes the core essentials of the faith, when faith becomes mere activity, then this can best be described as a faithless business.
This son of yours – Saturday, the second week in Lent – Micah 7:14-15,18-20/Luke 15:1-3,11-13
This son of yours – Saturday, the second week in Lent – Micah 7:14-15,18-20/Luke 15:1-3,11-13
The first reading taken from this 7th-century BC prophet reveals the heart of a man who pleads on behalf of his people. It is not that the people of Jerusalem had not heard the warnings of God; they simply did not heed them.
Micah is laying the praise thick; he is pleading with God who has been offended and rejected by a people He has loved and cherished. They have blatantly and repeatedly rejected his love. This is not a God who had been stingy in his loving. He had led his flock out of bondage into the rich and fertile pastures of Bashan and Gilead. Yahweh’s mercy and love were incomparable to the other gods; they were but a pale shadow of his mercy. Revealed in today’s text is the core of God; He is a God who DELIGHTS in his mercy.
That is something to sit back and think about. What do we delight in? To delight in something means that we are tremendously happy or exhilarated in or with something or somebody. Perhaps it is our home, our family, our job, a vacation or an ability. Micah tells us that God, delights in his people, in you and me; and in his mercy for us.
Micah whose very name means, “who is like our God” reminds us this Lenten season that we have a God who delights in us, delights in giving us, and delights in forgiving us. We are the only object of his affection. He loves no other. This is the kind of love that you and I seek from others in this world. We are reluctant to acknowledge that if we only accept God’s love, we will be truly happy. If only with St Augustine we confessed, “Our hearts were made for you Lord, they will never find rest until they rest in you.”
Yet you may ask, “Why then did God deliver his people, whom he delighted in, into the hands of the Babylonians? One should never forget the number of prophets who pleaded of Jerusalem to harken to his voice, one should never forget the number of sermons that we have heard, one should never forget the number of Lenten reflections that have been churned out, yet we harken not his voice. Mercy is not devoid of justice! I can’t get away with murder it needs a just punishment. This does not mean God rejects the man who committed murder. If that was his criteria then Jesus would be sitting in the Sanhedrin and not in the house of Matthew.
God’s wonderful mercy is reflected in the parable of what has commonly been called the ‘prodigal son.’ The mercy of God is seen in the Father who is waiting for his son and then runs to embrace this wayward child. Sadly, the mercy of the elder son is not only lacking it seems non-existent. In his anger, he refuses to come into the house where his wayward brother’s return is being celebrated. In his anger, he refers to his brother as “this son of yours” and not my brother. We desire God’s mercy but don’t want to pass the same on to those who have merely scratched our ego.
Let us learn to understand the words we profess, “forgive our sins as we forgive those who trespass against us.”
Haters beware! – Friday, 2nd Week in Lent – Genesis 37:3-4,12-13,17-28/ Matthew 21:33-43,45-46




Fr. Warner D'Souza is a Catholic priest of the Archdiocese of Bombay. He has served in the parishes of St Michael's (Mahim), St Paul's (Dadar East), Our Lady of Mount Carmel, (Bandra), a ten year stint as priest-in-charge at St Jude Church (Malad East) and at present is the Parish Priest at St Stephen's Church (Cumballa Hill). He is also the Director of the Archdiocesan Heritage Museum and is the co-ordinator of the Committee for the Promotion and Preservation of the Artistic and Historic Patrimony of the Church.