Malai kofta/paneer/mushrooms

You can make this lovely rich white gravy to go with koftas or paneer or any hardy vegetable. The gravy is simple to make. I used paneer and mushrooms in which case you can prepare the gravy and shallow fry the paneer. Add the mushrooms into the gravy when the gravy is cooked and allow it to cook for five minutes before adding the paneer. Once you add the paneer into the gravy, turn off the heat.

For the kofta you will need
Grated Paneer 250 grams
Potato – 3 boiled and grated
Fresh Coriander – 2 tablespoons chopped
Garam masala -1/2 teaspoon
Fresh green chilly – 1 chopped
Grated ginger – 1/2 teaspoon
Salt
Pepper

Kneed the above and make into round balls. You could stuff it with cashew nuts, raisins and a pinch of cardamom powder if you like. Roll it in cornstarch and let it rest for five minutes before deep frying. You don’t need to cook these koftas you simply need them to get a nice golden brown colour. Drain and set aside.

For the gravy

Onions -4 sliced
Green chillies- 2
Cashew nuts – 1/2 cup
Water – one cup

Boil the above for five minutes and purée when cool.

To make the gravy you need

Jeera – 1 teaspoon
Green cardamom- 2
Black cardamom – 1
Cloves – 3
Cinnamon – 1 inch stick
Bay leaf – 1
Ginger – one inch piece grated

In a pan heat oil and add the above and allow it to release it oils. Now add the onion and cashew paste and cook this with half a cup of water for five minutes.

To this add
1/2 cup cream
Sugar – 1 teaspoon
Coriander powder – 1 tablespoon
Black pepper – 1/4 teaspoon
Garam masala – 1 teaspoon
Salt
Kasuri methi (roasted on a hot dry pan) 1/2 teaspoon – to be used like a garnish 

Cook all of this for five minutes (except kasuri methi). You could add 1/2 cup fresh curd if you like but make sure you have beaten the curd to a smooth mixture

Drop the koftas into the gravy only when serving

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

 Poor impetuous Peter, he did it again! It’s almost like he must say something at every occasion. But then again it sounds like a lot of people we know.  It would be hard to doubt the intentions of this good man who often shot his mouth. On this occasion, he sought to push himself to a new limit of giving, perhaps in the hope of winning the Lords approval. It bombed again.

Rabbinical Judaism recommended that forgiveness be offered just thrice.  Peter, who by now is quite accustomed to the Lord’s call to love more and give more, now more than doubles the Rabbis recommendations to forgive. Peter offers a perfect number, one more than the recommended double. Besides seven was a perfect number for the Jews. Seven sounded like heaven; So how could the Lord not appreciate this magnanimous figure that outdid the Rabbis in the forgiveness of one’s brother?  He surely had this one right? errrrr….wrong again

Jesus outdoes ‘Petrine generosity’, hitting it out of the stadium to seventy seven times. This sounds very nice as a thought but practically the thought of keeping such a count of forgiveness would be tedious, to say the least. So why does Jesus set this rather insane figure? Is there some magic in the number seventy times seven?

Jesus parables and teachings are filled with ‘extremes’. He is always asking the disciple for more. That is the heart of Christian discipleship; the teaching that St Ignatius held close to him, ‘let’s give the Lord more (Magis in Latin). So the call of Jesus to his disciples is to love more, give more and forgive more.  This is encapsulated in the parable that Jesus proceeds to tell to make clear his point; a parable of ‘exaggerated’ forgiveness.

For the sake of understanding the ‘exaggerations’ let’s look at what a talent is and how much the wicked servant owed his master. A “talent” is a measure of weight, close to about 59 kilograms. If the debt was in silver it would be roughly equal to about 15 years’ worth of wages for the typical worker. The king in our parable is owed 10,000 talents, or about 1,50,000 years’ worth of income, which works out to more than 3,000 financial life sentences. This is no little debt.

On the other hand the wicked servant was owed by a colleague a mere hundred denarii. A denarius (plural = denarii) is a small silver coin that was roughly the daily wage for the typical worker. The servant in our parable is owed 100 denarii. Now compare the two amounts; three months debt verse three thousand financial life times.  Get the point?

So then, what makes the inability to forgive, such an issue in our lives? One issue is when we begin to tell ourselves ‘enough is enough’; I have forgiven this person thrice and everything has a limit. We set limits because perhaps we don’t want to be vulnerable and understandably so. But Jesus is making a bigger point. The Christian nature of forgiveness has no limit for a disciple.The call of Jesus is a call to tear down the wall of limits. Vengeance prevents us from moving forward for it simply adds to evil. Jesus wants us to understand that Christian forgiveness is an extravagant affair. The king forgives extravagantly so that we may forgive in the same measure; for this is the prayer we pray each day, “Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors.”
 Fr Warner D’Souza may be contacted on whatsap on +91- 9820242151
#ShareHisWORD #CommentsEncourage

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

Hope and Home were finally on-site for the Bombay Seminary at Bandra. The Examiner tried to bolster up the Seminary through explanations and advertisements that encouraged vocations.

In 1860 the resourceful Fr Leo Meurin S.J. was appointed Rector. He opened a ‘minor seminary’ at Bandra for boys who wished to test their vocation to the priesthood. The minor seminarians lived with the boarders and orphans of the School but were privileged to wear the clerical dress! The ‘major seminary’ trained young men, more mature in years. The major Seminary was housed in St. Peter’s Church building.

However two years later, in October 1862, Fr Meurin was called upon to develop St. Xavier’s School, opened by Mr. Furtado at Cavel. As he shifted his quarters from Bandra to Cavel, the Bombay Seminary (only major) followed suit. Thus Cavel was soon to be crowded by cassocked clerics.  Unfortunately, this move ended prematurely.  The School at Cavel was very much in its infancy and lacked the arrangements needed for a full-fledged Seminary.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

In order to understand this text well we will deal with the entire pericope starting from verse 1 -14. We are now in the fourth of the five great discourses of Matthew. Chapter 18 is the community discourse addressed to Peter and the disciples and broadly deals with community relations.

The text opens with the disciples asking Jesus who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. The entire pericope must now be seen on the basis of this question and not through a modern day application of issues or our own interpretation.

This question asked by the disciples is a bit of an oddity. You won’t be asking this question when twice before this; in rapid succession (Matthew 16:21-23 and 17:22-23) Jesus has declared his passion death and resurrection.  Perhaps what was bogging the minds of the disciples was the primacy of Peter, for Jesus in Chapter 16: 16- 19 had declared him to be ‘the rock’ and now the others wanted to know where they stood on the charts of power.

Jesus places a child in their presence as an answer to their question. They were driven by the desire to be given status and Jesus clearly demands that they change their mindset. Using a double negative he insists they will never enter the kingdom of heaven if they are driven by such earthly titles and honours.

Children, in first century Palestine were considered the lowest on the social strata. While they were loved and cared for they certainly had no rights. Jesus was not asking the disciples to emulate the faith of child but rather become like a child who has no rights. In verse five, Jesus humbles himself  identifying with a child who has no power and wants the disciples to do the same.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

The traversing Bombay Seminary was transferred to Surat by Bishop Hartmann. This exile is mentioned in The Examiner of December 16, 1852, in the following words: ‘On December 14th, the orphanage was opened at Parel, the ecclesiastical students having already re-moved at Surat, where our Seminary will henceforth remain.’

However, within two years the rolling stone found its way back home due to the changes taking place in the Vicariate of Bombay. Bishop Hartmann welcomed religious personnel other than the Carmelites – namely the Capuchins and the Jesuits. This favourable initiative led to some unfavourable events that ended the Carmelite administration of the Vicariate in 1853 (after more than a hundred years of service). The Capuchins too pulled out and left the Bombay – Poona Vicariate into the hands of the Jesuits in 1858!

Fr. Thomas of the Passion was the last Carmelite Rector of the Seminary. In April 1853, his post was taken by the Capuchin Fr. Fulgentius. Before the end of 1854, Fr Fulgentius was transferred back to Bombay to build the preaching ministry. The future of the Seminary now hung in the balance. On January 2, 1855, Hartmann in desperation wrote: ‘I have nobody (among the Capuchins) for the Seminary; I shall have to hand it over to the Jesuits, a number of whom are shortly coming.’

Thus a fresh chapter reopened in the history of the Bombay Seminary – this was its journey with the Jesuits.

In February 1855 the Bombay Seminary returned home to the little town popular to date in the annals of Catholicism – Bandra. The Seminary was dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and was housed within St Peter’s Church building.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading