Making bad choices – Thursday, 4th Week in Easter – Acts 13:13-25/ John 13:16-20

Read also https://www.pottypadre.com/change-of-guard/ based on the first reading of today.

The Gospel of John is broadly divided into four sections. The prologue: 1:1-18, the book of signs 1:19-12:50, which covers the seven signs that Jesus worked. We then have the book of Glory -13:1-20:31 and finally the epilogue: 21:1-25. Our text of today is from the book of Glory that covers the supper at which Jesus washed his disciples’ feet and then launches into a long private teaching with his disciples; this is also call the ‘farewell discourse’. Finally, the book of Glory ends with the passion, death and resurrection of Jesus.

Our text is the tail end of the washing of the feet. Jesus has commanded his disciples to do as he has done and he chose to become slave and wash the feet of the disciples. What Jesus has done in effect, is to precede practice before the theory lesson. In most cases, one is subjected to the theory class before one is sent to a practical session. Christ washed the feet of his disciples and then gave them the principle by which the disciples must live. By human standards, a servant or a messenger is not greater than the master or the one who has sent the messenger, yet the Christians is not to operate in this way. A Christian disciple must live the commandment to imitate Christ and wash the feet of the slave. This is love in service, love in action!

Yet this is not an easy teaching (as are many of Christ’s). Jesus said to his disciples., “If you know these things, you are blessed if you do it.” There are two IF’s in the sentence. Waving a Baptism certificate does not make you a disciple and even more, a disciple may not put Christ’s teachings in practice. The true disciples is the one who ‘hears the word of God and does it.’

Christ knew that every disciple is not devoted to him. He cites Judas (though not mentioned by name) as a case in point. Christ chose Judas and he says it, “I know whom I have chosen.” It is not that Christ made poor choices; he chose Judas to fulfill the scriptures. This does not make Judas a pawn of God or a victim of God’s plan but rather Judas had long given his soul to the devil. We are told in hindsight that he used to help himself to the common fund.

It is this betrayer who would sit at the most intimate gathering of love; at the last supper and yet choose to give in to satan’s temptation rather than the humble gesture of love and service that Jesus invited him to imitate. Judas made a choice; a very, very bad choice. Christ describes this bad choice as ‘the one who ate his bread and now lifts his heel’ in an attempt to kick and strike the Lord in rejection. How heavy that sentence should way on all our souls when we too have lifted our heal against the Lord when we chose the world over his commands.

Jesus was not looking for a group intervention or a counselling session for Judas. He was simply making clear that this was to happen and remembering the course of events the apostles may believe. The faith is transmitted through the Gospels so that we too may believe and in believing be saved.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

Can you hear his voice? Tuesday, 4th Week in Easter – Acts 11:19-26/ John 10:22-30

Read also https://www.pottypadre.com/no-solo-artist-this-one/ – reflection on the first reading.

Scripture tells us that winter has set in and Jesus is in the temple at the time of the festival of dedication (or Hanukkah), three months after the feast of tabernacles. John’ Gospel is a play on words so when he says “it was winter,” it hints that there is a spiritual chill in the air.

Jesus is in the portico of Solomon, also called the “Porch of Judgment. According to Josephus, Solomon’s Portico was a double-columned porch on the east side of the Temple near the court of the Gentiles. It was about 23 feet wide and the columns were about 40 feet tall. Josephus claimed they were white marble with cedar-panels for a ceiling.

It is here that the Jews (read Jewish religious authority) gather around Jesus. The preceding verses tell us that the Jews were divided after Jesus’ teaching on the good shepherd discourse. Clearly Our Lord was finger pointing at the Jewish religious establishment as the bad shepherds who abandon the flock when they were attacked by wolves. This time the division against Jesus ran so deep that some thought that he was out of his mind and had a demon. (John 10:19). “Why,” they ask “should one even listen to him.” Yet for those who had seem him heal the man born blind, they could not turn their eyes to the reality of what they saw and who he was. (John10:21)

Now that Jesus is in the temple for the festival, the Jews demand clarity from Jesus; “tell us plainly, if you are the Messiah.” This is not the first time that public opinion is divided over Jesus. In John 7:40-44 we hear that some think he is a prophet, others the Messiah. Such was divided public opinion that we are told that some wanted to arrest him.

At no point has Jesus been ambiguous; clarity has been his hallmark. Yet from the ones who cannot or rather do not want to acknowledge the reality of Jesus as the Christ, these questions keep coming up. Jesus is emphatic, “you do not believe.”

John’s gospel uses the word “to believe,” over 98 times. This accounts for a little less than half of the occurrences in the entire New Testament (241 times). In the Gospel of John, believing is not a matter of the head but in the person of Jesus Christ as Messiah. It is Jesus as Messiah that the Jews reject.

So clearly after having admitted in John 10:16 that Jesus has ‘other sheep that do not belong to THIS (Jewish) fold that he must gather.’ Jesus now declares that those who refuse to believe in him as Messiah are not his sheep (John 1026), they do not belong to him; they belong to another shepherd or another sheep fold. Note that Jesus has made every effort to win over these sheep, to convince them but it is they who ‘refuse to hear his voice’

But those who are his sheep listen to his voice and he gives them eternal life because he is the source of life. This gift of eternal life is a promise that is repeated several times in the Gospel of John. There are about 37 uses of the word life in the Gospel of John, of which about half refer to eternal life. It is this precious gift that the sheep who hear his voice receive.

Finally, in a clear and unequivocal answer to their original challenge, he tells his questioners: “The Father and I are one.” The power that the Son has is the same as the Father’s. This is not an unequivocal statement of divinity but points in that direction. And Jesus’ listeners hear it in that way.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

 

The man who taught Jesus a trade – Memorial of St Joseph the Worker

In order to understand this memorial, we need to understand a bit of its origins. In 1889, unchecked capitalism began to tear families apart as profit started to become the goal of work, rather than as a means of providing for one’s family. An even greater concern was the introduction of the philosophy of socialism, which was coupled with atheism. Socialism presented itself as a friend and ally to the worker, but it did so through objectively distorted means.

Socialism sought to eliminate religion, the family, and private ownership of property. Instead, each individual was to become a subject of the state, while the state took the place of God. Work was for the fatherland or motherland, not primarily to care for one’s family. It is in this context that Pope Leo XIII pointed the faithful to Saint Joseph. In Saint Joseph, workers had someone to emulate. Saint Joseph did not work to get rich. He was not a servant of the state. He was not an oppressed labourer who needed liberating. He was a family man who found dignity in work as he provided for his family in a humble way.

The idea of communism continued to gain support from many leaders around the world, and entire nations had succumbed to its ideas. In 1937, Pope Pius XI realised the serious threat that communism posed to the common good and called upon St. Joseph to protect the Church from the many errors of communism. He wrote, “We place the vast campaign of the Church against world communism under the standard of St. Joseph, her mighty protector.” As a result of Pope Pius XI’s words, Catholics fervently began to pray to St. Joseph, specifically under the title “Terror of Demons,” to combat the atheistic ideas of communism. They also invoked the help of St. Joseph in the cause of workers’ rights.

Finally, to confront the growing concerns posed by communism and its socialist philosophy on human labor and family life, Pope Pius XII instituted the Feast of Saint Joseph the Worker in 1955. It was his hope to foster a deep devotion to Saint Joseph among Catholics in the face of these growing challenges and in response to the “May Day” celebrations for workers sponsored by Communists.

Interestingly, work was not part of God’s original plan for humanity. Recall that when Adam and Eve were cast out of the Garden of Eden, God said to Adam, “Cursed is the ground because of you! In toil you shall eat its yield…” Thus, working “by the sweat of your brow” is a consequence of Original Sin. However, we must not see this consequence as something evil, but as a means by which we now fulfils our human mission.

By work, humankind both fulfils the command found in Genesis to care for the earth (Genesis 2:15) and to be productive in their labours. Saint Joseph, the carpenter and foster father of Jesus, is but one example of the holiness of human labour. Jesus, too, was a carpenter. He learned the trade from Saint Joseph and spent his early adult years working side-by-side in Joseph’s carpentry shop before leaving to pursue his ministry as preacher and healer. Human labour has dignity because it is an act of obedience to the will of God and is a participation in the work of God, the work of creation.

As we honour Saint Joseph the Worker, ponder your own call to engage in the dignity of work. As you do, put your work into proper perspective. What is the goal of your work? Do you work in an excessive way, seeking excessive gain? Do you grumble about your work and feel as though it is beneath you, holding you back from personal fulfilment?

Today, encourage yourself to strive for the virtuous way of Saint Joseph. Work hard to fulfil your vocation in life, and avoid excesses and extremes. We are made for love, for family, for faith, for charity, and for the glory of God and the salvation of souls. If your goals in life are anything other than these, then go to Saint Joseph the Worker and choose him as your model.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

Over my dead body – Monday, 4th Week of Easter – Acts 11:1-18/John 10:11-18

Yesterday we celebrated ‘good shepherd Sunday,’ traditionally celebrated on the fourth Sunday of Easter. Our Gospel text today is a continuation of that Gospel reading. Yet while this may be a very assuring text of the love of the good shepherd for us, the reality of this text is that it is within the context of hate towards Jesus.

This discourse actually emerges out of a conflict with the religious authorities in John 9. This conflict and its related discourse are flanked by attempts to stone Jesus (John 8:59; 10:31). John 10 begins in the middle of a quotation that has started at John 9:41. Jesus is continuing a conflict with the religious authorities, which they have started with the man born blind after Jesus has restored the man’s sight. When the authorities cast the man out, Jesus finds him and receives him as his own; as his “sheep”

Within this context one can clearly identify Jesus as the good shepherd; he declares it with another of the seven I am statements when he says, “I am the good shepherd.” The bad shepherds, also referred to as the ‘hired hand’ are clearly the Jewish religious establishment at the time of Jesus. The best way to approach this text is through a method of compare and contrast, a method used by Jesus in this very text.

The text begins by telling us that Jesu, the good shepherd, lays down his life for his sheep; a point that is repeated five times in eight verses. In short, Jesus was saying there is no way the wolves can get to my sheep; not over my dead body. This is key to understanding the mission of Jesus and his salvific role. He has come to die for us, to rescue us from the bondage of sin. The cross was not a tragedy it was a strategy. This is not forced upon him by the Father but as he declares, “No one takes it (his life) from me but I lay it down on my own accord. I have power to lay it down and I have power to take it up again.” This clearly is the primary mission of the good shepherd.

But there are other characteristics of a good shepherd that Jesus draws our attention to. Jesus says, “I know my own and they know me.” There is a mutual recognition of the sheep and the shepherd. On Easter Sunday morning, Mary of Magdala recognized the voice of Jesus. Jesus said that his sheep hear his voice. While the shepherd knows his sheep it is for us the sheep to also know Jesus the shepherd. We may think of sheep (ourselves) as being all the same, yet the shepherd knows they are individuals with their own personalities and characteristics and deals with them according to their individual needs.

Finally, we need to watch out for the bad shepherd. Their characteristics are more than evident in the lengthy description that Jesus gives. They are not the owners of the sheep, they run away in times of danger abandoning the sheep to the wolves. As a consequence, the sheep are scattered while some are snatched away. The bad shepherd does not lay his life for his sheep but protects himself. The Jewish religious authorities listening to Jesus clearly knew that he was speaking of them and in 10:31 will take up stones again to stone him.

This text draws attention to both the sheep and the shepherds of the Church. While the sheep must know the shepherd, recognize his voice and know which gate to enter, the shepherds have a clear calling to protect their flock. The title pastor, translates the same ancient Greek word used here for shepherd. It is a title that is only rightfully earned, not granted or assumed.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

No compromise – Saturday, 3rd Week in Easter – Acts 9:31-42/ John 6:60-69

The bread of life discourse now draws to an end and by human standards it ends tragically with many of the disciples abandoning Jesus and he being left with just the twelve apostles (6:67). Faced with such a situation, modern day church councils, irrespective of their denominations, would find themselves rushing around issuing damage control statements insisting that the words of Jesus were taken ‘out of context’ or that he has been ‘misunderstood’ and ‘misquoted.’ There would be an attempt to convince Jesus to retract his statements in the face of empty seats in the pews and obviously diminishing financial contributions. Twitter would have been abuzz.

It seems that the offer of ‘eating Jesus’ flesh’ did not fly well in the face of the disciples. Yet, Jesus was clear and definitely unambiguous. He declared that he was the bread of life, the living bread come down from heaven and whoever eats of this bread will live forever. Then Jesus added the one line that caused many to gasp in horror and make a quick getaway to the nearest exist; he declared that bread that he will give is his flesh. (John6:51).

Jesus was clear, the bread he gives is his flesh and he labours the point in 6:53-59. So clear is his teaching that the opening lines of today’s Gospel text tell us that the Jews, many of whom were his disciples, called this “intolerable language or as some Bibles have it, “difficult to accept.” Here is the proof we have to state clearly that there was no misunderstanding on the part of the Jews or his disciples. If they thought that Jesus meant that the bread he gives them was merely symbolic, they would not have left him. But they understood that he was crystal clear; “the bread that I will give for the life of the word IS MY FLESH.”

“Does this offend you?” (John 6:61) asks Jesus. This is a truth that we need to address. So often, we the ‘children of light’ are afraid of ‘offending’ the world whom we live to please. We want to make the language of faith inclusive till it is watered down and up for any lively interpretation. Yet Christ does not tip toe around broken glass, he is direct and clear. This is how the cookie crumbles! Faith must not be compromised and vigorously defended.

Finally, we are told that since many of the disciples left Jesus and no longer went about with him (John 6:66) Jesus turns to his apostles and asks them, “do you also wish to go away?” At once we must recognize that faith is not slavery but a choice we make in freedom. The response of Peter, “Lord to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life” are not some words of tragic despair rather but words of affirmation in the teachings of Jesus. What Peter was effectively saying was, ‘because we believe where else can we go?’

Faith grows on you if you are open to it. Peter acknowledges that when he says, “we have come to believe and know that you are the Holy one of God.” Ironically the fervent words of Peter’s faith are not the last words of Jesus in the John Chapter 6. What is not included in the text is the last words of Jesus on this matter. He, the living bread who gives us his flesh to eat for our salvation will be betrayed by one of the twelve who chose to stay back with Jesus. Judas had the chance to walk away but this “devil,” as Jesus called him, chose to stay on and bring sadness to others. Perhaps it is good that some walk away so that the others may practice the true faith peaceably.
– Written with malice to none

Read also https://www.pottypadre.com/resurrecting-the-heart/ based on the first reading

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading