Not just any hike on a mountain – Saturday, 6th Week in ordinary time – Mark 9:2-13

And now for the second time the father bears testimony to the son. Jesus the beloved, is acclaimed by God as ‘His voice’; “listen to him “says God. Earlier in Chapter 1:11, God proclaims Jesus as his son in whom he is ‘well pleased’. So surely, the transfiguration must be a pivotal point in the gospel of Mark. Attached to this pericope is what is called the Elijah question (11- 13). Let us understand this pericope a bit more.

Jesus has just pronounced the first of His three passion predictions and teachings on discipleship. He will do this again in chapter 9: 31 and 10: 33. Peter has pronounced Jesus as the Christ but is far from understanding what the Father’s revelation to him means. Scripture tells us that Peter is lost in an illusion of an earthy kingdom of power. He therefore remonstrates with Jesus in an attempt to prevent him walking down the road of suffering. Now as it were, to reiterate his earlier question on whom men thinks Jesus is, the Master takes Peter, James and John up a high mountain.

We have no idea where this place definitely is. Scholars have opined that it may be Mount Tabor or Hermon. In the Old Testament, mountains were the usual settings for supernatural revelations and manifestations of God. In the New Testament Jesus teaches the Sermon on the Mount and dies on the cross on mount Calvary. These manifestations are called theophanies. (Theo= God, Phaneroo = make clear) It is here that the form of Jesus changes; that’s why we call it the ‘transfiguration’. Peter’s confession is now revealed in visual form. The disciples of Jesus see the master’s glorious state which so far, they have been revealed only in words. This is the glorious state that Jesus will have after his death and resurrection. It is this glorious state that we will all have in heaven.

To a Jew, listening to this narrative, the reality could not be clearer. Moses and Elijah represented the fullness of the law and the prophets; Moses, to whom the law was given and Elijah who embodied the role of the prophets. The presence of Elijah also forms a link to the following verses

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

Memorial of St Kuriakose Elias Chavara – Matthew 9:35-38

Kuriakose Chavara was born in 1805 in Kerala, India in a small village of Alleppey district in the Travancore state. After his early schooling in the native village he felt a great desire to become a priest. He first began studies under the local parish priest. At the age of 13 in 1818 he entered the seminary and was ordained a priest at the age of 24.

In 1831, along with Fr. Thomas Palackal, under whom he himself had done his seminary studies and Fr. Thomas Porukara, he founded the first indigenous religious congregation for men, now known as the Carmelites of Mary Immaculate (CMI). It was after the death of his senior companions in the foundation that Fr. Kuriakose, together with the first members, made the religious profession in 1855.

He took the name Kuriakose Elias of the Holy Family and established seven religious houses in different parts of Kerala. This new congregation made great strides in the spiritual renovation of the Syro-Malabar Church. Seminaries for the education and formation of the clergy were established, annual retreats for priests and people were conducted, a publishing house, the first wooden press in Kerala for the propagation of Catholic doctrine was started along with a house for the dying and destitute. The newly established congregation also focused on the catechumens and schools for general education. All these were set up by the new congregation under Fr. Kuriakose Elias’ leadership.

Fr. Chavara also introduced valuable improvements and reforms in the Syro-Malabar liturgy. In 1866, with the co-operation of Fr. Leopold Boccaro OCD, he started the Congregation of the Mother of Carmel (CMC) for women. When a schism threatened the Church in 1861, Fr. Kuriakose Elias Chavara, the then Vicar General of the Syro-Malabar Church, took a strong stand and effectively thwarted the schism that would have divided the Church in Kerala.

Fr. Chavara has also written a number of books. His counsel to Christian families given in the form of the ‘Testament of a Loving Father’ is relevant to this day. Essentially a man of prayer and intense charity, he lived in close communion with the Lord amidst his several religious and social activities. Owing to his deep spirituality that permeated all his actions, he was accepted as a man of God, from his early years.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

Thursday, 6th Week in ordinary time – Year 2 – Title right, meaning wrong! -Mark 8: 27-33

The Gospel of today tells us that Jesus is near Caesarea Philippi, a very Roman setting and once the limit of ancient Israel’s northward extension. Here he pops the question which almost seems like a public and personal opinion poll: “Who do people say that I am?” It seemed like such a casual question, almost like Jesus was asking for some feedback, “Oh, by the way, who do people say I am?” I think it takes a lot of guts to ask for such feedback. Imagine a priest announcing one Sunday morning that he is going to conduct an anonymous survey of what the congregants thinks of him or even worse if they think him to be a boring preacher.

So why does Jesus want to discuss his reputation, here at this borderland of Caesarea Philippi? Interestingly, Jesus asked this question twice in this text but with different focus groups. He wanted to know first who people thought he was and then who his disciples thought he was. Was Jesus having an identity crisis mid-way through the Gospel of Mark? And I would not be wrong to think that because the stories leading up to this episode repeatedly emphasize the disciples’ ignorance and hardness of heart. In chapter 4 they ask: “who is this?” In Chapter 6 they mistake Jesus for a ghost.

The fact that we hang around with someone does not mean that we know them. Initial attraction, for most people, either to a cause or a person is based on perception and while we should not judge a book by its cover that’s often the case. So let’s make one thing clear, Our Lord is not asking for self-affirmation from the public because he plans to stand for the post of High Priest, he knew who he was but he also knew that this fact may not have been obvious to the rest of Israel, as was the case.

To Jesus’ question, we are told that the people offer John, Elijah, or one of the prophets as responses to Jesus’ question. They seem to have given sensible answers considering that John had just been executed and also their belief that it would be Elijah’s arrival that would usher in the Messiah. And then comes Peter calling Jesus ‘the Christ’. The word Christ has not appeared since the Gospel’s opening verse. So, Peter’s claim, “You are the Christ,” is an astounding statement. Also, in the Gospel of Mark, Jesus hasn’t done anything that looks particularly “Christ”-like. So, how did Peter make this claim?

Peter did answer correctly but did he understand what he had said? We now know that Peter did not understand the meaning of what he said because he goes on to rebuke Jesus when Christs’ understanding of what the Messiah is contradicts Peters understanding. Peter had got the title right but the meaning wrong. The title “Messiah” in Hebrew or “Christ” in Greek was associated in Jewish tradition with an anointed king, a royal figure from the line of David expected to come and free Israel from their Gentile oppressors, purify the people, and restore Israel’s independence and glory. Hence, Peter’s declaration could best be translated as “I think you’re the one who will purify our society, reestablish Israel’s supremacy among the nations, and usher in a new era of peace and holiness. I’m expecting big things from you.”

Nothing in Jesus’ career up to now has given any indication of claims to royalty or political ambitions. So far Jesus has made no claim to be the Messiah, and he certainly has shown no sign of taking on the Romans. Perhaps Peter hoped that when they go to Jerusalem, Jesus would finally take on this messianic role. Perhaps that is why Jesus tells his disciples to tell no one about him, because he knows that they are still so very far from understanding what he is all about.

In the face of Peter’s confession, Jesus had to recast who “the Christ” is and what the Christ will do. Jesus won’t wield power over others; instead, powerful and cynical people will have their way with him. He sets the record straight for his disciples and perhaps even for us. Today’s text will be the first of multiple times (three to be precise) that he will speak of his impending suffering, rejection, death, and resurrection. He also — finally! — starts to tell his disciples and others just what he wants from them. Already he has beckoned some to follow him. He had also appointed apostles (3:13-19a), but now he describes what following means: it is self-denial and cross-bearing. Now we see where this road of discipleship will lead: in losing one’s life, and ironically thus to save it. Following Jesus will also make a particular kind of statement for the disciple, since crosses figure in the equation. Discipleship is going to get messy.

Perhaps Peter’s expectations from Jesus were not so very different from what we want in a Saviour. We want someone who is strong and powerful, someone who will rescue us from our troubles and defeat our enemies. Too often in popular evangelism, Jesus is presented in this way — as a kind of superhero who solves every problem for us, as a guarantor of prosperity and success. Nothing could be further from what Jesus has in mind. IF we wish to be his disciples then it’s high time many of us drop our wish list of what Christianity should be and follow what Christ meant it to be.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

Memorial of Gonsalo Garcia – Matthew 10:17-22

My dear friend, the late Fr Larry Pereira, always said that Christianity is not for ‘namby-pambies’. The word has more than just a nice ring to it for it conveys a truth. It is dangerous when we propagate personal devotions to Christ over the tougher message of the Gospel.

Let me give you an example and please don’t get me wrong, I have no disrespect for the feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus or any other devotion. I grew up with this devotion and still have devotion but this devotion has always been portrayed as ‘sweet’, ‘merciful’ and for ‘namby-pambies’. I have yet to hear, on the feast day, a homily that challenges us to follow the Lord’s heart of justice, suffering in mission or one that confronts evil. Somehow the devotion has always been presented as ‘sweet’.

If we are truly to follow the heart and mind of Jesus then the road is narrow and less trodden. The Gospel of today is a fine example of what a Christian is called to. Perhaps in some parts of the world or country, we don’t experience what is described in today’s Gospel; the flogging, hatred, being put to death and the terror of having to flee your home. But that means one of the two things; either we don’t live in that part of the world where this happens or we don’t go out in mission in our part of the ‘safe’ world.

The apostles did not even need a choice. They were burning with passion for the Lord. Not only had they been given great authority they were also given the consequences of that authority and none of those consequences were ‘pretty’.

St. Gonsalo Garcia whose feast we celebrate today, was a perfect reflection of today’s Gospel. Born around 1556 in the fortified city of Bassein in the Portuguese quarter of India. His father was Portuguese soldier and his mother was a native. Gonsalo Garcia was tutored by the Jesuits at Bassein Fort. He wanted to become a missionary, but was turned down because he was too young. At the age of 15 he accompanied a Jesuit priest to Japan. Having learnt Japanese on the voyage, he turned out to be a popular catechist among the younger locals.

He worked for eight years in the Japanese missionary fields with the Jesuits. He tried to join the Jesuit order, but he was turned down because of his native origin. Having lost hope, he moved to Alcao as a merchant. Through his business transaction he came into contact with many high-ranking members of Japanese society, including the emperor.

His dream unfulfilled, he moved to the Philippines and worked with the Franciscans as a lay brother. A few years later, he was accepted by them as a Friar Minor. He was sent back to Japan as translator for a diplomatic delegation, and continued teaching Catechism there.

The success of the Franciscans angered the Buddhist priests. They tried to get the king to expel the Franciscans, but he refused. However, that was about to change. A Spanish treasure ship named the San Felipe was forced to land because of a storm. The captain erroneously told the local Japanese custom agent that the Franciscans had been sent by the Spanish king to influence the people to rebel against their ruler. This lie was taken advantage of by the enemies of the Franciscans.

When Taikosama heard the story, he was enraged and ordered that all missionaries in Japan be arrested and executed. The Franciscans were arrested on December 8, 1596 and sentenced to death. The following February, 26 Christians were taken to a hill outside of Nagasaki and crucified.

Gonsalo was the first to be crucified. Once the missionaries were nailed to the crosses, the soldiers pierced each one through the heart with a spear. Upon seeing this, Christians in the crowd broke through the guards and used pieces of cloth to soak up the blood of these holy martyrs.

An example of missionary sacrifice, he was the first Indian to be declared a saint and was canonized on June 8, 1862 by Pope Pius IX.  He is the Principal Patron of the Diocese of Vasai, and Second Patron of the Archdiocese of Bombay.

The Church today seems to have a certain disconnect because we are perhaps more inclined to rituals and devotions. In order to be on fire with the word of God, to be connected to His message and to reject a ‘namby-pamby’ style of Christianity, requires us to be reconnected to His Word in the Sacred Scriptures.

We glibly pass on fake news via social media without verifying the truth behind it but are afraid to spread the truth about His Word. Perhaps that is our mission today. Pass on the Good News, stop spreading the fake new.

Fr Warner D’Souza

Written with malice to none

References from the JBC

References about St Gonsalo taken from the Website of the Archdiocese of Chicago and Bombay)

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading

Not a pie in the sky when you die – 6th Sunday in ordinary time – Luke 6:17,20-26

If Matthew had his “Sermon on the Mount” (5:1-7:29) Luke pens his “Sermon on the Plain.” In Luke’s account, this is Jesus’ second major policy statement of his ministry. Previously in Luke 4:14-30 he had proclaimed ‘good news to the poor’. Now to those ‘poor’ He gives them a set of attitudes.

Clearly Luke is setting an agenda for Jesus; this is the Messiah that has come for ‘all’ but who makes a preferential option for the poor. For most of us today the very word poor wraps its self around an outcome; namely material poverty which would make today’s reading very hard for an affluent person to swallow. The four beatitudes in Luke’s Gospel are followed by four ‘woes’ for those who are rich. How could Jesus who has come for ‘all’ now start excluding some?

It makes sense therefore for us to examine the text in order to understand what Jesus wanted to say. The focus of Jesus’ address in Matthew and Luke’s Gospel are the disciples (not to be confused exclusively with the apostles). These are those, like us, who follow Jesus freely and hence make a choice in accepting His calling and way of life. Despite the fact that most of us were born Christian (by convention) it is in the reception of the sacrament of confirmation that we accept Jesus freely as a disciple (by conviction). Remember that Jesus never held a gun to our head and forced us to be His disciples, His words were, “IF you wish to be my disciple”

In addressing the disciples and us, Jesus is asking us to make a choice in our way of life and is not declaring a particular social class blessed. In the Gospel of Luke, Jesus is reconstituting a ‘new Israel’. Remember that a few texts before this he picked 12 apostles. In picking 12 in number, Jesus is reconstituting he 12 tribes of Israel. Hence the kingdom that Jesus establishes is not exclusively ‘of the poor’ but one that freely choose ‘to be poor’.

Spread the love ♥
Continue Reading