When a council gave sound counsel – Wednesday, 5th Week of Easter – Acts 15:1-6
Paul and Barnabas have returned from their first missionary journey. As a rule they always went first to the synagogue to preach the message of Christ, as they did in Iconium and Antioch of Pisidia. But we know that in Lystra there was no synagogue and so the apostles began to preach to the people in the streets. It is here that they first minster to the Gentiles.
On returning to Antioch, they report to the whole Church that “God had opened the door of faith for the Gentiles.” As inconsequential as this statement may seem, it will be the cause of much division in the Early Church and become for Paul, a constant challenge in his ministry.
It was in Antioch, that some individuals who came down from Judea, began to teach that salvation could only be obtained through fidelity to the Law of Moses and as manifested through the act of circumcision. From Paul’s own experience of his first missionary journey, he had come to believe that one was saved by Jesus freely, and that the Mosaic Law had no role to play in salvation. It is no wonder then that he and Barnabas had “no small dissension and debate” with these individuals from Judea.
It is interesting to see how the Early Church solved their disagreements; and dare I say with a spirit that goes beyond the mere confines of what we consider democracy. We are told that in order to resolve this dispute, the Church in Antioch decided to send Paul, Barnabas and “some of the others” to Jerusalem to discuss the issue with the apostles and elders.
Interesting to note the term ‘Judaizer’.
I’ve observed Judaizers even in our own parishes when they confine themselves to the parish Church and restrict othes from the neighborhood parishes, from participating in their parish. Whereas, the ‘intruders’ do so, out of convenience.
Disagreements are natural but could be handled in a right way after discussing with spiritual leaders. There are many who do not respect the opinion of others and also command them to follow their conviction. This could be dangerous when a person is learning the faith.
I would ponder on the way the issues were resoved in early church and implement them in my own life.
Father, I have two questions. First what was the torn in Paul’s flesh ? Have heard many opinions and it all seems confusing. Second, Can we conclude that this first Council of Jerusalem was the beginning of the tradition of council’s in the church? Thank you.
Jose, no one knows what this thorn was. It could have been a habit or a failing. What ever it is the point being made is that this thorn in his side kept him humble before the Lord and he acknowledges it in humility. Also this was the first Eccumenical council There was no intention for it to be called a council as we understand it but looking at the scriptures and tradition we are able to find governing principles for all counicl ( local or universale)
I would like to compliment you for the lucid and succinct manner in which you condense the essence of the readings. I am sure it is a labour of love to reach out to the laity who is hungry for such understanding. Thank you.